Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

| January 23, 2018

Scroll to top


court Archives -

Sessions Takes ‘Rare Step’ With Court Request on DACA

January 16, 2018 |

The Trump administration is apparently so sure that a federal court it deems to be liberal will rule against it on DACA that it’s taking the unusual step of simultaneously appealing to the Supreme Court. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Tuesday that the Justice Department will ask the high court…

Supreme Court to Consider Internet Sales Tax Collection

January 13, 2018 |

The Supreme Court said it would consider whether states can broadly require online retailers to collect sales taxes even for states where they lack a physical presence—with a potential major impact on online commerce. US Business

Top judges angry about functioning of India’s Supreme Court

January 12, 2018 |

Four senior judges of India’s Supreme Court have come out in the open complaining about the working of the country’s top court.
FOX News

CFPB leadership remains uncertain despite another Trump administration court victory

January 11, 2018 |

The leadership of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau remains under a cloud of uncertainty despite another Trump administration victory in the legal battle over who should be the agency’s acting director.

A federal judge on Wednesday denied a request for a preliminary injunction to remove…

L.A. Times – Business

Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner to Settle Divorce Out of Court

January 11, 2018 |

There won’t be any hot gossip coming out of the Huma Abedin-Anthony Weiner divorce proceedings—because, as the New York Daily News reports, the former couple has agreed to finalize the divorce out of court. “In order to reduce any impact of these proceedings on their child, the parties have…

In NC, an Unprecedented Court Decision on Voting

January 10, 2018 |

Republican lawmakers in North Carolina have some unexpected work to do before this year’s midterms: A federal court just ripped up the state’s voting map and ordered the GOP-controlled General Assembly to draw a new one, reports the News & Observer of Raleigh. The three-judge panel ruled unanimously that Republicans…

Told Treehouse Must Go, Pair Appeals to Supreme Court

January 7, 2018 |

Lynn Tran and Richard Hazen built a Florida beachfront treehouse that would be the envy of any child. It’s got two levels, hammocks, and windows looking out on the Gulf of Mexico. But the hangout has cost the couple a handsome sum: about $ 30,000 to construct and probably five…

Court Backs High School Student’s Anthem Protest

December 31, 2017 |

A federal court has sided with a California high school football player who took a knee during the national anthem, reports the Los Angeles Times . The Native American teenager, identified as “V.A.,” sued after the San Pasqual Valley Unified School District put a rule in place banning such protests…

Ross Ulbricht’s Fate in the Hands of the US Supreme Court

December 28, 2017 |

Ross Ulbricht’s Fate in the Hands of the US Supreme Court

Ross Ulbricht formally submitted a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), seeking a hearing for the overturn of a decision upheld this year by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Mr. Ulbricht’s double-life sentence without the possibility of parole is at stake.

Also read: Bundesbank Board Member: No Plans to Issue State-Backed Cryptocurrency

Ross Ulbricht’s Fate in the Hands of the US Supreme Court

Ross Ulbricht Files Supreme Court Appeal

“Ross William Ulbricht respectfully petitions for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in this case,” read the terse beginnings of a landmark plea to literally the last resort for Mr. Ulbricht.

Writ of certiorari orders the lower court, which upheld Mr. Ulbricht’s conviction and sentence, to deliver its records so that the Supreme Court may review them and decide if further examination is necessary. The SCOTUS is a nine member body which acts as the final arbiter in legal matters. Currently the Court has five members considered more conservative, while four are thought to be on the permissive side. Neil Gorsuch, recently appointed by President Trump, is said to be not bad on 4th Amendment issues, one of the grounds on which Mr. Ulbricht’s appeal is based. Ross Ulbricht’s Fate in the Hands of the US Supreme Court

There’s still a while to go before anything concrete can be known. The SCOTUS is under no obligation to pick-up the petition. In fact, of the 7,000 or so they receive per year, they’ll hear at most 150, a niggardly .02 percent. Very often the Circuit Courts are the final word in the great majority of cases. And of the appellate courts, the 2nd Circuit has a comparatively low reversal rate by the SCOTUS, so even if the case is ultimately heard that is no guarantee Mr. Ulbricht will see relief.

The generally agreed test for the SCOTUS to hear a writ involve cases of national significance, to establish a precedence, or put to rest existing contradictions in decisions. Four of the justices must vote to accept a case. Justices’ clerks are in charge of first reviewing the writ, and it is they who write a summary and recommend hearing. Justices then take their recommendations to a conference for a final decision as to whether full hearing is warranted.

Ross Ulbricht’s Fate in the Hands of the US Supreme Court

Two Questions

Mr. Ulbricht’s appeal focuses on two questions, according to the writ: “1. Whether the warrantless seizure of an individual’s Internet traffic information without probable cause violates the Fourth Amendment. 2. Whether the Sixth Amendment permits judges to find the facts necessary to support an otherwise unreasonable sentence.”

The United States Constitution is odd in the sense the bulk of the document describes what government does, its various functions, and then come amendments to those functions. The first ten are known as the Bill of Rights, and they specifically forbid government from certain transgressions, no matter the excuse. Ross Ulbricht’s Fate in the Hands of the US Supreme Court

The relevant portion of the Fourth Amendment under consideration reads, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause[.]” The relevant Sixth Amendment portion reads, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury[.]”

According to a memorandum obtained by Brian Doherty of Reason, “This case presents two important questions of constitutional law with broader significance for the rights of criminal defendants generally,” writes lead attorney Kannon K. Shanmugam. “First, the Second Circuit affirmed the government’s warrantless collection of Mr. Ulbricht’s Internet traffic information by relying on the third-party doctrine, which the Court is reviewing in a different context this Term in Carpenter v. United States….This case would afford the Court an ideal opportunity to address how the doctrine applies to Internet traffic information,” he claims.

Ross Ulbricht’s Fate in the Hands of the US Supreme Court

Law for the Digital Age is Badly Needed

Mr. Doherty explains, “Shanmugam, a former law clerk to the late Justice Antonin Scalia, has argued 21 previous cases before the Supreme Court, has had at least five wins there, and has a good record of a 36 percent success rate in having cert petitions granted by the Court from 2012-2015 (and a 38 percent such success rate from 2013-2017),” which bodes well for Mr. Ulbricht.

Warrantless searches are at play, potentially, in the case because information used against Mr. Ulbricht was gathered under the “third party doctrine.” This allowed law enforcement to effectively search his IP address and personal laptop, which are presently thought to be available publicly over the internet through a modem or telecommunications company. The doctrine stems from before a time when internet service and laptops and phones were a person’s everyday lifeblood, and as such is in great need of updating. Is this information citizens are knowingly making public? Or, is such information assumed to be private? It’s all the difference in the world.

Ross Ulbricht’s Fate in the Hands of the US Supreme Court
Kannon K. Shanmugam

Also of grave concern is Mr. Ulbricht’s sentencing itself. “Ulbricht’s Sentencing Guidelines range would have resulted in a recommended sentence of, at most, 30 years in prison,” Mr. Shanmugam insists, but the judge took into account, beyond a jury, accusations never proven, including murder, to assess punishment. Mr. Doherty writes, “The Second Circuit in his initial appeal ‘reluctantly affirmed, concluding that the alleged murders for hire separated the case from an ordinary drug crime.’”

For the broader bitcoin community, Ross Ulbricht is someone many feel a debt is owed. Silk Road, according to many, provided a safer environment for buyers and sellers of products disliked by governments. The earliest use cases of bitcoin, cryptocurrency, were proven viable and, it’s not too far to claim, valuable due to such fearless experimentation. A great many enthusiasts view Mr. Ulbricht as someone who the government picked-on to send a horrible message.  

What do think of Ross Ulbricht’s chances? Let us know in the comments section below.

Images courtesy of Pixabay,

Keep track of the bitcoin exchange rate in real-time.

The post Ross Ulbricht’s Fate in the Hands of the US Supreme Court appeared first on Bitcoin News.

Bitcoin News

Asylum Cases Gum Up Germany’s Court System

December 26, 2017 |

A steep surge in lawsuits by migrants to reverse asylum decisions, fend off deportation threats or obtain more financial support is gumming up the German justice system. What’s News Europe