Watchdog Archives -
A federal watchdog is calling on the Environmental Protection Agency to strengthen its oversight of state drinking water systems in the wake of the lead crisis in Flint, Michigan, the AP reports. The EPA’s Office of Inspector General says in a report that the agency must take steps now to…
A framework has been developed for the G20 countries to “monitor the financial stability implications of crypto-assets markets.” The Financial Stability Board says cryptocurrencies “do not pose a material risk to global financial stability” but supports their “vigilant monitoring.”
G20’s Crypto Monitoring Framework
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) announced Monday that it “has developed a framework and identified metrics to monitor the financial stability implications of crypto-assets markets.” The framework was developed in collaboration with the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI).
The board also published and submitted a report detailing its work on crypto-assets to the G20 as requested by finance ministers and central bankers at the G20 meeting on March 19 and 20 in Buenos Aires.
The FSB is an international body that monitors and makes recommendations about the global financial system to G20, an international forum for governments and central bank governors. The CPMI supports financial stability by promoting the safety and efficiency of payment, clearing, settlement and related arrangements.
“The objective of the framework is to identify any emerging financial stability concerns in a timely manner,” the report states, adding:
The framework discusses the primary risks within crypto-assets and potential transmission channels to financial stability risks. The framework identifies which metrics the FSB might usefully monitor in the short-to-medium term.
The report also notes that “in general, monitoring the size and rate of growth of crypto-asset markets is critical to understanding the potential size of wealth effects, should a decline in valuations occur.” Furthermore, “the use of crypto-assets for payment or settlement is another transmission channel to be monitored.”
FSB’s Proposed Metrics
Citing that the crypto market and its public data sources, which the proposed monitoring metrics are based on, are “rapidly evolving,” the FSB warned that “the quality of the underlying data can vary, and might not always be satisfactory.” The report explains:
Market-related figures, such as metrics on prices, trading volumes, and volatility may be manipulated by generally prohibited practices such as ‘wash trading,’ ‘spoofing,’ and ‘pump and dump,’ the existence of which cannot be ruled out at this stage.
The FSB also pointed out that “the proposed metrics may not fit all types of crypto-assets equally.” Nonetheless, it believes that they “provide a useful picture of crypto-asset markets and the financial stability risks they may present.” Over time, the FSB and the CPMI will consider improvements to the metrics as well as add new ones at a later stage.
No Material Risk to Financial Stability
The FSB report refers to decentralized, unbacked cryptocurrencies and crypto-assets as “first generation private digital tokens,” which are dismissed as “unsafe money.” However, it notes that “safer central bank issued cash may be less convenient in an era of electronic payments.” The report continues:
Crypto-assets do not pose a material risk to global financial stability at this time…At present, like crypto-assets in general, crypto-asset platforms do not pose global financial stability risks. Nevertheless, they raise other significant concerns, including consumer and investor protection, market integrity and money laundering/terrorism financing, among others.
The FSB further revealed that the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is currently “conducting an initial stocktake on the materiality of banks’ direct and indirect exposures to crypto-assets.”
While the FSB does not believe crypto-assets pose a material risk to global financial stability, it supports “vigilant monitoring in light of the speed of developments and data gaps,” the report details.
What do you think of the FSB’s crypto monitoring framework? Let us know what you think in the comment section below.
Images courtesy of Shutterstock, BIS, and FSB.
Need to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Check our tools section.
Critics say CFPB nominee Kathy Kraninger lacks the experience to be the nation’s top consumer financial watchdogJune 19, 2018 | dailybusinessnews
Nominees for top federal financial regulators usually have worked in high-level government or private-sector jobs, and President Trump had been following that traditional playbook. Until his latest pick.
His choice for comptroller of the currency was chief executive of Pasadena’s OneWest Bank;…
FBI Director Christopher Wray and Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz are expected to be the centers of attention Monday when they testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Horowitz’s bombshell report on the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s personal email server.
A much-anticipated report by the Justice Department’s inspector general says James Comey mishandled the Hillary Clinton email controversy in the waning days of the 2016 election, reports Bloomberg . However, the report by Michael Horowitz may disappoint supporters of President Trump by concluding that the former FBI chief wasn’t motivated by…
The global chemical weapons watchdog says the nerve agent sarin and toxic chemical chlorine were “very likely” used as weapons in two attacks in central Syria in late March 2017.
If the stakes weren’t so high, it would be incredibly fun watching financial firms and their Republican allies repeatedly make the case that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a rogue agency determined to undermine capitalism, democracy and the American way of life.
My absolute favorite…
The global chemical-weapons watchdog confirmed Britain’s analysis of the type of the nerve agent used in the poisoning of former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter.
WSJ.com: What’s News Europe
The State Financial Monitoring Service of Ukraine has published its official position on crypto matters. While offering some borrowed definitions of terms like virtual currency and mining, the agency notes that changes to the legal status of cryptocurrencies in the country are expected.
In a statement published on its website, SFMS said it was constantly collecting, processing and analyzing financial data, including crypto-related information. According to the official announcement, the agency is following transactions that are subject to regular monitoring, but not only. Dubious money flows outside the mandatory scope are also monitored.
Ukraine’s financial watchdog has drawn attention to one of its main priorities – the implementation of customer due diligence measures. The agency believes regulatory efforts in that area should be focused on cryptocurrency exchanges, wallet providers and intermediaries between the traditional financial system and the crypto ecosphere. It said these parties should abide by the current Ukrainian anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing legislation.
The monitoring service has also clarified its stance on several other aspects of regulation. Noting that it expects changes to the legal status of cryptocurrencies in Ukraine, SFMS admits it is currently following guidelines from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The Paris-based intergovernmental organization has issued recommendations to combat money laundering and terrorism financing. It has also provided definitions of several crypto-related terms, that Ukrainian regulators plan to use until their country adopts new legislation.
In the statement, SFMS differentiates between electronic money – the digital form of fiat currency, and cryptos, referred to as “virtual currencies”. It explains that cryptocurrencies can be traded digitally and used as unit of account. They can also serve as means of exchange and storage of value. However, the agency points out that cryptocurrency is neither issued, nor guaranteed by any jurisdiction. It performs its functions on the basis of an agreement reached within peer-to-peer networks of users, Ukrainian officials say, educating the public.
Ukraine has yet to adopt its own cryptocurrency regulations. Three drafts have been introduced in the Verkhovna Rada since last year. The first bill, submitted in October, defines cryptocurrency as property that can be exchanged for goods and services. The second draft law states that cryptos are financial assets. The third bill proposes tax exemptions for profits from crypto trading and mining incomes.
According to Ukrainian media, experts from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development have been involved in the preparation of another draft that should be presented in the next few weeks. Its authors hope to legally define crypto terms, introduce blockchain solutions, and regulate ICOs, Anycoin news reports.
Calls are mounting to regulate and legalize cryptocurrencies in Ukraine. In January the cybercrime combating department of the National Police said they should be either legalized, or banned. Ukraine’s Justice Minister Pavel Petrenko stated that government institutions should respond to the phenomenon and bring bitcoin into the legal field. Cryptocurrencies have been discussed during a meeting of the National Cybersecurity Coordination Center in Kiev. Experts have warned, however, that the legalization process may take several months.
Do you think Ukraine will adopt cryptocurrency regulations soon? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.
Images courtesy of Shutterstock.
Make sure you do not miss any important Bitcoin-related news! Follow our news feed any which way you prefer; via Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, RSS or email (scroll down to the bottom of this page to subscribe). We’ve got daily, weekly and quarterly summaries in newsletter form. Bitcoin never sleeps. Neither do we.
The post Ukraine’s Financial Watchdog Clarifies Stance on Cryptos appeared first on Bitcoin News.
The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) has revealed that it received more than 1,200 complaints relating to cryptocurrencies via its ‘Scamwatch’ portal during 2017. In light of the number of complaints, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has issued a warning to potential investors outlining the risks associated with cryptocurrency investment.
Australia’s Consumer Watchdog Received 1,289 Complaints Relating to Cryptocurrencies Last Year
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation has reported that data obtained from the ACCC indicates that Australian citizens’ losses to cryptocurrency scams totaled $ 1,218,206 AUD ($ 955,000 USD approximately) for 2017. The number of complaints received last year has prompted Australia’s corporate regulator, ASIC, to issue a warning to potential cryptocurrency investors.
John Price, the ASIC commissioner, recently described cryptocurrencies as “quite speculative products [that] can be quite high-risk. It’s been quite well documented that some of these products are scams, so please don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose some or all of your money.”
Increasing Regulation of Australia’s Cryptocurrency Sector
From April onward, Australian businesses providing cryptocurrency exchange services will be required to register with AUSTRAC, Australia’s financial intelligence agency, and report information regarding the transactions of their customers.
Under the new legislation, it will be illegal for an “unregistered person” to provide virtual currency exchange services. “Businesses that trade digital currencies for money, and vice versa, will be required to enroll and register with AUSTRAC,” Justice Minister Michael Keenan said in August 2017 during a parliamentary speech regarding the then regulatory proposals.
Angus Taylor, Australia’s new federal minister for cyber security, recently praised the new legislation, stating “We’ve had a lot of cooperation from the cryptocurrencies because they know they need to be legitimate, they know they need to be part of our financial system, and they know they don’t want to be facilitating illegal and criminal activity.”
“We’ve acted early, we’ve acted much earlier than many other countries around the world,” Mr. Taylor added. “Obviously cryptocurrencies are growing, and it’s appropriate that the Government establish a regulatory framework with a particular focus on criminal activity.”
Do you think that cryptocurrency scams warrant further regulatory intervention, or should the onus be placed on investors to conduct proper due diligence? Share your thoughts in the comments section below!
Images courtesy of Shutterstock, Wikipedia
Need to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Check our tools section.
The post Australia’s Consumer Watchdog Received 1289 Crypto Complaints in 2017 appeared first on Bitcoin News.